Wikileaks Has Dropped All The Evidence Needed To Destroy Robert Mueller’s Career

Day by day, we discover new and more condemning information about the FBI’s giant cobweb of corruption.

Recent revelation shows that the infamous Uranium One deal, that was conducted under the leadership of former President Barack Obama, opens up even more, new questions regarding the corruption among the Justice Department, the Obama Administration and former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.

With this deal, the Democrats enabled Russia, who they now regard as America’s biggest enemy, to get a hold of as mush as 20% of the United States urani

Will the FBI corruption ever stop? It’s like they are just an extension of

According to recently discovered documents, all signs are pointing towards Hillary Clinton. The former Secretary of State, reportedly assisted the transfer of highly enriched uranium which was previously seized by the U.S. Department of Energy in a 2006 nuclear smuggling sting operation. The operation included one Russian national and several other accomplices from Georgia.

As it appears, the person who delivered the uranium to the Kremlin was no one else but the than former FBI Director Robert Mueller. Mueller who is now the head of the nonsense Trump-Russia investigation that is tormenting the President, his family and his associates.

Allegedly, back in 2009 the Kremlin had asked for a ten-gram sample of highly enriched uranium which had been previously confiscated about three years earlier during a nuclear smuggling sting operation in Georgia which involved one Russian national and several Georgian accomplices.

The highly enriched uranium that was confiscated then was transferred under custody of the United States and was kept at a secure DOE facility. After Russia requested the sample, the Georgian Government allowed the U.S. to give the material to the Russians for forensic analysis.

The whole act was carried out by Robert Mueller, under the orders of the then Secretary Hillary Clinton, who in exchange for the deal received a generous “Contribution,” to the Clinton Foundation.

Here is what Wikileaks has revealed. Check it out :


PER E.O. 12958: REASONS 1.4 (A) AND (G).

 1. (SBU) This is an action request: Embassy Moscow pleasesee para 6 and 7; and Embassy Tbilisi please see para 8.

2. (S/NF) Background: Over two years ago Russia requested a
ten-gram sample of highly enriched uranium (HEU) seized in
early 2006 in Georgia during a nuclear smuggling sting
operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian
accomplices. The seized HEU was transferred to U.S. custody
and is being held at a secure DOE facility. In response to
the Russian request, the Georgian Government authorized the
United States to share a sample of the material with the
Russians for forensic analysis. Director Mueller previously
planned to deliver the sample in April (Ref A), but due to a
scheduling conflict the trip was canceled. Embassy Moscow
LegAtt informed the FSB prior to Mueller’s intended April
delivery and received confirmation that the FSB would take
custody of the sample after the Director’s plane landed. EST
Moscow also informed Rosatom of the planned transfer and that
the U.S. placed a high priority on completing this transfer
(Ref B). Once the LegAtt told FSB counterparts the April
trip had been canceled, Ambassador Beyrle informed Igor Neverov (Ref C),

who said that he understood but was disappointed the trip
was postponed. The September 21 visit provides again an
opportunity to deliver the requested ten-gram sample from the
seized HEU in order to obtain cooperation from the GOR on
this nuclear smuggling case and to eventually establish a
more productive mechanism of U.S.-Russian cooperation on
nuclear forensics.

3. (S/NF) While there was a reasonable exchange of
information with Russian security services at the time of the
2006 seizure, we have had poor cooperation investigating the
diversion of HEU, which the United States believes was stolen
from a Russian facility. Russia did not respond to papers
that then Acting U/S Rood provided Deputy Foreign Minister
Ryabkov in December 2008 reiterating the USG position that
Russia should pick up this sample in the United States.
Further, when asked for an update on their response to our
proposal, Ryabkov told us in early 2009 in Washington that
there was an interagency dispute over who would come and pick
up the material.

4. (S/NF) Given Russia’s reluctance to act so far, FBI
Mueller’s delivery of this sample will underscore to Russia
our commitment to follow through on this case. While some
details related to the sharing of information on smuggling
networks may be too sensitive to discuss, delivery of the
sample could enable us to discuss whether Russian authorities
investigated the diversion and prosecuted anyone. Moreover,
we hope it will spark discussions on mechanisms to exchange
information and material on future incidents of this nature,
particularly in light of the commitments made in the July
summit U.S.-Russia Joint Statement on Nuclear Cooperation
regarding strengthening our cooperation to stop acts of
nuclear terrorism. Posts should note that DOE/NNSA’s April
2009 determination authorizing distribution of the sample to
the Russian Federation only for attribution of the sample in
support of a criminal investigation is applicable to the
proposed September 21 delivery of the sample to Russia.

5. (S/Rel Russia) Background con’t: On April 16, the FSB
verbally confirmed to Legatt that we will have no problem
with the Russian Ministry of Aviation concerning Mueller’s
flight (although we probably won’t see paperwork until
shortly before the trip). The FBI is requiring that the
sample be turned over to a Russian law enforcement authority
(i.e., FSB) as opposed to an intelligence service (i.e., SVR)
or technical authority (i.e., Rosatom). A representative
from the responsible Russian Law Enforcement authority, who
will accept custody of the sample, must be identified and
verified ahead of time. That individual will be required to
have signatory authority to accept the sample. Appropriate
arrangements need to be made to ensure the transfer of
material is conducted at the airport, plane-side, upon
arrival of the Director’s aircraft. Post should also remind
the GOR that this is the material about which the GOR gave
the USG nonproliferation assurances in 2008 in a diplomatic
note from February 2008 (Ref D). 

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *